though those of you that follow my
google reader shared items (namely, durrell and conor) may have already seen this, i felt this was good enough to share here. well, that, and it's been a long while since i've posted anything.
those that know me from college know that, despite writing a rather lame
music column for it, one of my favorite pastimes was criticizing
the campus, the student newspaper. those that have known me even longer know that the habit extends all the way back to
the mirador, which somehow hasn't made the jump online (i even had to create its
wikipedia page). in dc it was whatever that paper is called that they give out on the metro.
now in china it is the
people's daily, perhaps the best of the bunch. the paper is the official mouthpiece of the chinese communist party, and the english language version is a clunky attempt to showcase china to the rest of the world. and by the rest of the world, i mean tourists who come to china. and me. because i read the headline of every single story posted to the website every day. which lets me pick up some choice articles, like this awkward attempt to be relevant on
valentine's day, this bizarre art choice on a
christmas story, or this
hard-hitting reporting on people being "fussy" because they can't watch more tv post-Olympics.
the article that prompted this post, however, was actually quite interesting and well done, about how the government is planning to end
guaranteed lifetime employment for civil servants. (to my former coworkers: you thought you had it good!) it starts off talking about potential changes, like actually firing people for poor performance, moves to some background about the number of civil servants, and then ends with a bang:
More people consider jobs in the civil service as easy option.
"I would like to trade my current job, even though it pays better, for a government job because I want more personal space," Beijinger Xiao Liu, who sat the entrance exam last year, said.
In the past, government positions guaranteed workers cradle-to-grave employment and basic welfare. But the central government is keen to introduce new rules to ensure public sector employees actually work for a living.
bam! someone doesn't think highly of government workers, though it's funny to think that whoever wrote that line
works for the official newspaper of the communist party, which isn't exactly the cutthroat private sector either. makes me wonder if some english polisher snuck that in under the editors' noses, though he/she seemed to miss the mistake in the first sentence.
in other news, this blog's biggest fans came and visited me in beijing last weekend. here is a picture of them in one of the gallery spaces in the 798 art district. the vaulted ceilings are excellent in bringing in natural light. those east german architects were smart.